Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jackson-Edney, et al. v. Labrador, et al.
as 26-4551
Plaintiff:
EMILIE JACKSON-EDNEY, DANIEL DOE, DIEGO FABLE and others
Defendant:
RAUL LABRADOR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho, JAN M BENNETTS, In her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Ada County, PETER DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Adams County and others
Strouse v. Crosby et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00525
Plaintiff:
Kristy Marie Strouse
Defendant:
Warden Crosby and Elmore County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strouse v. Crosby et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00528
Plaintiff:
Kristy Marie Strouse
Defendant:
Warden Crosby and Elmore County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Strouse v. Crosby et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00526
Plaintiff:
Kristy Marie Strouse
Defendant:
Warden Crosby, Elmore County Jail and Officer Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strouse v. Crosby et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00527
Plaintiff:
Kristy Marie Strouse
Defendant:
Warden Crosby and Elmore County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shirley v. Dozier et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00473
Plaintiff:
Terrell Brent Shirley
Defendant:
Michael Dozier and Elmore County Judical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-11173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Smith v. Mike Harper, et al
as 26-10679
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL R. SMITH
Defendant:
MIKE HARPER, LEE MACON and SHERIFF OF ELMORE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
