Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Whatley v. Elmore County Probate Office et al
as 2:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley
Defendant:
Elmore County Probate Office and John Thomton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Education: Handicapped Child Act Procedural Safeguards
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Elmore County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Elmore County Jail, Mark K. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Neely v. Elmore County et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Neely
Defendant:
Elmore County, Elmore County Commission, Henry Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Riggs v. Elmore County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Bradly Eugene Riggs
Defendant:
Elmore County and Betsy Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Elmore County Department of Human Resources (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Mitchell
Defendant:
Elmore County Department of Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
