Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Frazier v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Bill Franklin, Captain Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Captain Tuck, Terrance Dovantae Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Shaquille Parker v. Elmore CF Warden, et al
as 20-14495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL FRANKLIN, Elmore County Sheriff and ELMORE CF WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walker v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Curtis Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Montrez Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00830
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Department of Corrections Personal Board Director and others
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00832
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Alabama Department of Corrections, Charmelle Luckie and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Clay Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
