Cases 31 - 40 of 220
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv12216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lopez v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
as 3:2013cv01888
Plaintiff:
Jessica Lopez
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Doty et al
as 6:2013cv06412
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Glenn E. Doty, Equable Ascent Financial LLC, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Landmark Financial Solutions LLC v. Murphy et al
as 1:2013cv05142
Defendant:
Sharon Murphy, Ilinois Department of Revenue, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Landmark Financial Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Sands v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv80675
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sands
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Hayt, Hayt and Landau, P.L.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Padilla v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01377
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Padilla
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ratcliff v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01385
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ratcliff
Defendant:
Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC and Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv01399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
