Cases 61 - 70 of 1,050
Sonya Greene v. Department of Veteran Affairs, et al
as 14-1312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SONYA GREENE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS and ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rory Walsh v. Michael Hagee, et al
as 14-5058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rory M. Walsh, Natural Guardian of S.J.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael W. Hagee, James R. Clapper, Jr., Director of National Intelligence, Chris Conner, District Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Joseph Anoruo v. Eric Shinseki
as 14-15391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CHIDI ANORUO
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veteran Affairs
Brink v. General Eric K. Shinseki, USA (Ret.) et al
as 4:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michele Brink
Defendant:
General Eric K. Shinseki, USA (Ret.) and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
National Law Center on v. DVA, et al
as 14-5038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Law Center On Homelessness and Poverty
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Defense and others
Morris Peavey v. USA, et al
as 14-5040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Morris J. Peavey
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, John M. McHugh, Secretary of US Army, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Rouzier v.Shinseki
as 1:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rouzier
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
