Cases 1 - 10 of 14
T.L. v. Orange Unified School District et al
as 8:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
T.L.
Defendant:
Orange Unified School District, Ernest Gonzalez, Craig Abercrombie and others
Interested Party:
William M. Lozano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hester v. USA
as 22-40052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyton Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Ernest Gonzalez
Hester v. USA
as 21-40244
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, State of Texas, Pamela Thielke, Director of Parole Division and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tyton Hester
Donnell v. Gonzalez
as 4:2020cv00714
Plaintiff:
Lamon Sandel Dewayne Donnell
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hester v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez and USA
Plaintiff:
Tyton Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. United States of America et al.
as 4:2020cv00066
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, State Of Texas, Special Agent Jenifer Sparks and others
Plaintiff:
Tyton Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hardy v. Ernest Gonzalez, et al
as 13-40385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MARK HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
ERNEST GONZALEZ, Assistant United States Attorney, ROBERT GERARD ARAMBIDE, Public Defender, TOMMY MOORE, Paris Police Department and others
Hardy v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
David Mark Hardy
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez, Robert Gerard Arambide, Tommy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hardy v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
David Mark Hardy
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez, Robert Gerard Arambide, Tommy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mills v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Geary Mohammed Mills
Defendant:
Ernest Gonzalez, Steven Paul Maurizio, Eric Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
