Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Bennett v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv00603
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Captain Frank Heroux, Andrew Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones and Corey Alan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00399
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett, Ezra Shelton, Deangelo Montez Moody and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Michael Parris, Steve Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Korey Cooper, Donna Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Joplin et al
as 3:2018cv00349
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett, Tyler RayBon-Tate, Anthony Woods and others
Defendant:
Tom Joplin, Carolyn Jordan, Robert Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Rainer et al
as 3:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett, Greggory Griggs, Gary Carr and others
Defendant:
Michael Rainer, Michael Keys, James Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ernest Brown , Michael Russell , Ernest Lewis and others
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bennett v. Cooper et al
as 3:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Korey Cooper, Robin Fish, Dan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Allianceone Receivables Management, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lewis
Defendant:
Allianceone Receivables Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 USC 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Lewis v. Allianceone Receivables Management, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lewis
Defendant:
Allianceone Receivables Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 USC 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Bennett v. Parker, et al.
as 3:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Donna Turner, Mandy Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
