Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Newkirk v. English et al
as 5:2019ct03274
Defendant:
Mark E. Myers, Duplin County Sheriff's Office, County of Duplin and others
Plaintiff:
Darwin Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Seth Edwards, Spencer Merriweather, Mike Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al Do not docket in this case. See new case number 5:17-ct-3192-BO.
as 7:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017ct03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry , Paul Hardison , Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al CASE OPENED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE CORRECT CASE 5:17-CT-3192-BO.
as 7:2017ct00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUART, et al v. HUFF, et al
as 1:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D. , JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D. , DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D. and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D. , ROY COOPER , LANIER M. CANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
