Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES OTSTOTT, Lieutenant General, USA (Ret.), EUGENE R. FIDELL, Lieutenant Commander, USCG (Ret.), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense and others
Defendant:
CRAIG NOBLE, Dr., MACK D. KEEN, Senior Chief Consolidated Brig, JOHN D. ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General and others
Estela Lebron v. Donald Rumsfeld
as 11-6480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTELA LEBRON, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla and JOSE PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Former Secretary of Defense, CATHERINE T. HANFT, Former Commander Consolidated Brig, MELANIE A. MARR, Former Commander Consolidated Brig and others
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, Former Attorney General, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL H. MOBBS, Special Advisor to Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and others
Jose Padilla, et al v. John Yoo
as 09-16478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE PADILLA and ESTELA LEBRON
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN YOO
Amicus Curiae:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BRUCE FEIN and others
Padilla et al v. Yoo
as 3:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jose Padilla, Jose Padilla, Jose Padilla and others
Defendant:
John Yoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lebron et al v. Rumsfeld et al
as 2:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
Estela Lebron, Estela Lebron, Estela Lebron and others
Defendant:
Donald H Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, Robert M Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
