Cases 41 - 50 of 268
Jenkins v. Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator
as 1:2021cv00557
Defendant:
Estill (FCI) Food Service Administrator, Cook Supervisor and Food Service Administrator
Plaintiff:
Steve Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Education of Thornton Township High Schools, District 205 et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020op45281
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Fayette County Public Schools, Board of Education of Harrison County Public Schools, Board of Education of St. George Municipal School District and others
Defendant:
CVS Indiana L.L.C., Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a/ Watson Pharma, Inc., WALMART INC., f/k/a WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Anderson v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv03453
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Estill
Petitioner:
Anthony Edward Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Houston Jr v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2020cv01532
Defendant:
Thompson, Warden Brian Williams, Brawn Keyturner and others
Plaintiff:
Brick Pommeroy Houston Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estill County Public Schools, By and Through The Estill County Board of Education v. Juul Labs Inc.
as 3:2020cv04871
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Estill County Public Schools, By and Through The Estill County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TYLOR J ESTILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51315
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KARL ESTILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03375
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ESTILL ALAN CAREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
