Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04670
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barry et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00023
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Barry, Jesse David Abbott, Andy Wayne Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Barry et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2022cv01560
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Barry, Jesse David Abbott, Andy Wayne Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00381
Petitioner:
Frankie Eugene Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Armstrong v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
as 6:2016cv02028
Plaintiff:
Eugene Armstrong
Defendant:
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Frankie Armstrong
as 15-2794
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Frankie Eugene Armstrong
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv14006
Petitioner:
Frank Eugene Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lavelle Eugene Armstrong v. Matthew Cate
as 2:2011cv09794
Petitioner:
Lavelle Eugene Armstrong
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Armstrong v. USA
as 2:2009cv14110
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Frank Eugene Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. Frank Armstrong
as 09-2106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANK EUGENE ARMSTRONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
