Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2020cv00077
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Arthur Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39386
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COLMAN EUGENE MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00084
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15605
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Eugene Lavergne, et al v. United States House of Rep, et al
as 19-5028
Defendant / Appellee:
Kim Guadagno, Honorable Lt. Governor/Secretary of State, Christopher Porrino, Honorable Acting New Jersey State Attorney General, Karen L. Haas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Martin Lavergne
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Allen J. Cannon, Frederick John Lavergne, Scott Neuman and others
Adam Martin v. Unknown Party
as 19-15160
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Adam Martin v. USDC-AZT
as 19-70129
Undetermined:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Other:
In re: ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Petitioner:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Adam Martin v. USDC-AZT
as 18-71723
:
In re: ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Petitioner:
ADAM EUGENE MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Warden USP - Tucson
Martin v. Unknown Party
as 4:2017cv00371
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Cambell et al
as 1:2017cv03096
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Martin
Defendant:
Edward Cambell, Barbara Bartz and Persons Known and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
