Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Newsome v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv20468
Plaintiff:
Aaron Eugene Newsome
Defendant:
Ms. Evelyn Garth, Ms. Sanchez, Mark Inch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Centurion of Florida, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv02178
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, LLC, Veronica L. Baker, Bobbie L. Cannon and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Eugene Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haight v. Newsom et al
as 4:2018cv00590
Defendant:
National Judgment Recovery Center, L.P. and B. Eugene Newsom
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Haight
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, M. Colon and H. Coulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01545
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, Officer Torres and R. Wilbur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Johnson et al
as 6:2015cv01489
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsom
Defendant:
Chief Johnson, Officer Torres, L. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME v. CLEMMONS et al
as 4:2014cv00612
Defendant:
M CLEMMONS, J E SPEIGHTS, PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
AARON EUGENE NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Speights et al
as 6:2014cv01804
Plaintiff:
Aaron Eugene Newsome
Defendant:
J.E. Speights, M. Clemmons, Officer Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04116
Plaintiff:
Teena Francisco , Shelly Frenzel , Christopher Frenzel, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Newsome v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02906
Plaintiff:
Eugene Newsome
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
