Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Evapco, Inc. v. Mechanical Products Southwest, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03375
Plaintiff:
Evapco, Inc.
Defendant:
Mechanical Products Southwest, LLC, Frank Schmitt and Environ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Henry v. Evapco Inc., et al.
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Evapco Inc. and Regina Henry
Plaintiff:
Melanie Henry and Raymond Henry Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company et al v. Evapco, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Evapco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, as subrogee of Amy's Kitchen, Inc.; and AGCS Marine Insurance Company, as subrogee of Amy's Kitchen, Inc., AGCS Marine Insurance Company and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EVAPCO, INC. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv03139
Plaintiff:
ARTURO MANJARREZ FERNANDEZ and EVAPCO, INC.
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
US EXTRUDED PRODUCTS LLC V. EVAPCO, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
US EXTRUDED PRODUCTS LLC
Defendant:
EVAPCO, INC. , EVAPTECH, INC. and TOWER COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Evapco Inc et al v. Midwest Cooling Tower Services L L C
as 6:2016cv01113
Plaintiff:
Evapco Inc , Evap Tech Inc , Evapco Products Inc and others
Defendant:
Midwest Cooling Tower Services L L C
Garnishee:
Midwest Cooling Tower Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEARWATER SYSTEMS V EVAPCO
as 09-1284
Defendant-Appellee:
Bullock, Logan & Associates, Inc., Evapco, Inc. and John W. Lane
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Clearwater Systems Corporation
Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. v. Evapco, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Evapco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
