Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Barton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Teresa Barton
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company, The Proctor & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Evonik Corporation et al
as 2:2019xc14736
Defendant:
Evonik Materials Corporation, Cornerstone Chemical Company, Evonik Degussa Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry L. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-31235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Evonik Degussa Corporation v. Hoku Materials,Inc.
as 1:2013mc00224
Plaintiff:
Evonik Degussa Corporation
Defendant:
Hoku Materials,Inc.
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Evonik Degussa Corporation v. Hoku Materials Inc.
as 1:2013mc00012
Plaintiff:
Evonik Degussa Corporation
Defendant:
Hoku Materials Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Evonik Degussa Corporation v. Hoku Materials, Inc
as 1:2013mc07481
Plaintiff:
Evonik Degussa Corporation
Defendant:
Hoku Materials, Inc
Evonik Degussa Corporation v. Hoku Materials, Inc.
as 1:2013mc00011
Plaintiff:
Evonik Degussa Corporation
Defendant:
Hoku Materials, Inc.
Robert Zebrowski, et al v. Evonik Degussa Corporation Adm, et al
as 13-1026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT J. ZEBROWSKI, ROBERT A. WOODRUFF and GREGORY BIALY
Defendant - Appellant:
EVONIK DEGUSSA CORPORATION ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, EVONIK DEGUSSA CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN and EVONIK ROHMAX USA, INC. NON-QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
