Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dickerson v. EXPRESS SERVICES INC.
as 2:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Toya Dickerson
Defendant:
EXPRESS SERVICES INC. d/b/a EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS and EXPRESS EMPLOYMENT PROFESSIONALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Guadiano v. Express Employment Professionals
as 5:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Albert Lerma Guadiano, Jr
Defendant:
Express Employment Professionals a corporation doing business in Oklahoma doing business as Express Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FAGINS v. EXPRESS SERVICES INC
as 1:2021cv00034
Defendant:
Gator Gypsum, Inc., Express Services, Inc., d/b/a Express Employment Professionals, GATOR GYPSUM INC and others
Plaintiff:
Artis Fagins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Salvas v. Ralco Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00435
Plaintiff:
Theodore Salvas
Defendant:
Ralco Industries, Inc., Express Services, Inc. and DCKalberer & Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Salvas v. Ralco Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00434
Plaintiff:
Craig Salvas
Defendant:
Ralco Industries Inc, Express Services Inc and DCKalberer & Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reinhardt v. Krebs, City of et al
as 6:2015cv00330
Plaintiff:
Ilana Reinhardt
Defendant:
Krebs, City of, Allford, Ivester, Green & Hogan, John A. Allford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinhardt v. Krebs, City of et al
as 6:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ilana Reinhardt
Defendant:
Krebs, City of, Allford, Ivester, Green & Hogan, John A. Allford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazzard v. Express Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Tabbie D. Hazzard
Defendant:
Express Services, Inc. and Navistar Defense, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ABC Charter, Inc et al v. Bronson
as 1:2008cv21865
Plaintiff:
ABC Charter, Inc, ABC Charter, Inc, ABC Charter, Inc and others
Defendant:
Charles H. Bronson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
