Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
BATES v. CROWN HEALTH CARE LAUNDRY SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2018cv02187
Defendant:
CROWN HEALTH CARE LAUNDRY SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. BATES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Barbara McCourtney-Bates v. Walter Bates, et al
as 16-15129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA MCCOURTNEY-BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER F. BATES and WILLIAM F. PRUMMELL, Charlotte County Sheriff
:
SERVICE
Thompson v. Robinette et al
as 2:2015cv01928
Plaintiff:
Mark Shane Thompson
Defendant:
J. Robinette, D. Cohn, M. Rosales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCourtney-Bates v. Bates et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
Barbara McCourtney-Bates
Defendant:
Walter F. Bates and William G. Prummell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721
Bates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
Carla F. Bates
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malone v. Beard et al
as 2:2014cv02096
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Malone
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Hahn, M Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56353
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. BATES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Tai Huynh v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 11-15177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAI HUYNH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, MIKE MCDONALD, TOM FELKER and others
Castucci, et al v. US
as 09-2183
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
BRIAN CASTUCCI, DENISE CASTUCCI, RICHARD J. CASTUCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS, JAMES J. BULGER and others
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
US DISTRICT ATTORNEY, District Attorneys for the Suffolk, Norfolk, and Middlesex Districts of Massachusetts and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
