Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hammons v. State of Texas
as 26-40043
Plaintiff:
Houston Samuel Hammons
Defendant:
State of Texas, United States of America, Thomas Free, Officer and others
Bello v. Linder, et al
as 26-5009
Plaintiff:
OLAMIDE OLATAYO BELLO
Defendant:
PHILIP A. LINDER, MARK L. WATSON, SEAN JEFFEREY TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-40682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marshall v. Fannin County Hospital Authority, et al
as 4:2025cv01032
Plaintiff:
Gracie Marshall
Defendant:
Fannin County Hospital Authority doing business as Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation Center, Arlington I Enterprises, LLC and Creative Solutions in Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. Ray
as 25-40542
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks, III
Defendant:
Tony Ray, Deputy, Fannin County Sheriff's Office, Mark Johnson, Sheriff, Fannin County Sheriff's Office, FNU Saxon, Nurse, Fannin County Detention Center and others
Moody v. Fannin County Jail et al
as 4:2025cv00910
Plaintiff:
Moneke Danyell Moody
Defendant:
Fannin County Jail and Titus County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00756
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00736
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00602
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
