Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Dillard v. Wray
as 24-50304
Plaintiff:
Carviel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Attorney General FNU Garland, Attorney General FNU Rosenblum and others
Kohute v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
FBI, CIA, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaFond v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
David LaFond
Defendant:
Department of Justice, FBI, FTC Fraud Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Legal Bay et al
as 3:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Legal Bay, Mega Leads, James Alamia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Allen-Smith v. US Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen-Smith
Defendant:
US Marshall and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sanchez v. DOJ
as 23-40708
Plaintiff:
Paul Eric Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Robert F. Bryson, ATF Internal Affairs, Agent Graden, ATF Internal Affairs and others
Montez v. FBI
as 5:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Horton v. FBI et al
as 3:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dwight Horton
Defendant:
FBI and KKK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dillard v. Wray et al
as 5:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Carvel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Att. Gen. FNU Garland, Att. Gen. FNU Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feds for Medical Freedom et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv01817
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, adam arce, jose villela and others
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, US Dept of Justice, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
