Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Gwendolyn Hall v. Christopher Wray et al
as 2:2024cv06014
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher A. Wray
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alhabbal et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv02329
Defendant:
Mr. Alejandro Mayorkas, Antonio Donis, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray and others
Plaintiff:
Lujain Al Habbal, Rand Alhabbal, Raed Alhabbal and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Provino v. Wray
as 24-40418
Defendant:
John Richards, Rick Perry, Christopher Wray, FBI Director and others
Plaintiff:
Raphael M. Provino
Hall v. Wray, et al.
as 24-4507
Defendant:
Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and FBI Director CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Dillard v. Wray
as 24-50304
Plaintiff:
Carviel Gordon Dillard
Defendant:
FBI Director FNU Wray, Attorney General FNU Garland, Attorney General FNU Rosenblum and others
Emmett v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
IRS, IRS Corporation, IRS Director Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Edington v. Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking, et al.
as 24-2563
Petitioner:
DANIEL C. EDINGTON
Respondent:
ARIZONA GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL ON HUMAN TRAFFICKING, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, FBI Director, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Gwendolyn Hall v. Christopher Wray et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
FBI Director Christopher A Wray and Assistant FBI Direct Donald Alway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. Wray, et al.
as 24-1057
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
FBI Director CHRISTOPHER WRAY and DONALD ALWAY, Assistant FBI Direct
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
