Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Standard Security Life Insuran, et al v. FCE Benefit Administrators, In
as 19-2336
Defendant / Appellant:
FCE BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STANDARD SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and MADISON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, STEPHEN PORTER, GARY BECKMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP, CHIMES D.C. INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, THE CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INCORPORATED and others
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1122
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, CHIMES INTERNATIONAL, LTD., MARTIN LAMPNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP and JEFFREY RAMSEY
Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York et al v. FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York and Madison National Life Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Fringe Benefit Group, Inc. et al v. FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00369
Defendant:
FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc. and Chris Porter
Plaintiff:
Fringe Benefit Group, Inc. and Fringe Insurance Benefits, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Acosta v. Chimes District of Columbia Inc et al
as 3:2018mc00010
Plaintiff:
Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Chimes District of Columbia Inc
Movant:
FCE Benefit Administrators Inc , Stephen Porter and Gary Beckman
Respondent:
BH Benefits Inc
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Midwest Transport, Inc. v. FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc.
as 4:2007cv04408
Plaintiff:
Midwest Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
FCE Benefit Administrators, Inc. and Califia Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
