Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Gonzalez-Coss v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Felipe Gonzalez-Coss
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garces Robles et al v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Edgar Garces Robles, Ramiro Soto Altamirano, Juan Jose Soto Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Maria Ramirez, John Cirone, Felipe Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez Gonzalez v. Garland
as 23-1162
Petitioner:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hicks v. Davis
as 23-40109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Lee Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Individually and in official capacity, Warden Felipe Gonzalez, Individually and in official capacity, Assistant Warden Anthony Patrick, Individually and in official capacity and others
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Ramos Vela, Casey Celum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Felipe Gonzalez, Jr., Ramos Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Felipe Garcia
as 22-4074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GARCIA
USA v. Felipe Garcia
as 22-4078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ GARCIA
USA v. Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez
as 22-50050
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ
USA v. Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez
as 22-50049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
