Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fowlkes v. Gaffney et al
as 1:2018cv10441
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Erin C. Gaffney, Peter L Pascucci, John F. Camelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2015cv13243
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Lisa A. Mitchell, Michael J. Devine, Jeanie Lahousse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Barry et al
as 1:2014cv12659
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
John F. Barry, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowlkes v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv04301
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Barack Obama, John F. Barry, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Felipe Fowlke
as 13-5155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President, Nancy Pelosi, U.S. House of Representative, John A. Boehner, U.S. House of Representative and others
FOWLKES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013mc00507
Plaintiff:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, NANCY PELOSI, JOHN A. BOEHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowlkes v. Rodriquez
as 11-4382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodriquez, Correctional Counselor, Edward M. Adler, Dennis Breslin and others
Fowlkes v. Adamec
as 10-5192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
Joseph F. Gibbons, Administrative Law Judge
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Thomas, District Manager and John Adamec, Counselor
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-2394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, KRISTIE LADOUCER, LOIS RUSSO and others
Fowlkes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 09-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, DAVID A. RENIER and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
