Cases 1 - 10 of 18
VESSELS v. EDISON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv02211
Plaintiff:
BRIAN VESSELS
Defendant:
EDISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feneis v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12692
Plaintiff:
Terri Feneis
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jannetta v. Dayton et al
as 0:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
David James Jannetta
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lucinda Jesson, Tim Pawlenty and others
Timothy J. O'Meara v. Warden Robert Feneis
as 09-2161
Petitioner - Appellant:
Timothy J. O'Meara
Respondent - Appellee:
Warden Robert Feneis
Coleman v. Fabian et al
as 0:2009cv01103
Petitioner:
Douglas Coleman
Respondent:
Joan Fabian and Robert Feneis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Beck v. Dr. Stephen Craane, et al
as 09-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reverend Beck
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Richard H. Kyle, Magistrate Judge Franklin Noel, Kari Jo Ferguson and others
Joe H. Bandy-Bey v. Robert Feneis, et al
as 08-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joe H. Bandy-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Feneis, Jennifer Southwick, Denise Barger and others
McIntyre et al v. Feneis et al
as 0:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brandon McIntyre, Shane Jensen and Lamont Tarrence McGee
Defendant:
Robert Feneis, Mark Uner and Andy Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Feneis et al
as 0:2007cv04868
Plaintiff:
Lamont Tarrence McGee
Defendant:
Robert Feneis, Mark Uner and Steven McCarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olhausen v. Fabian et al
as 0:2007cv04593
Plaintiff:
Alan G. Olhausen, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan Fabian, Guy Bosch, Feneis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
