Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Bobeck v. Bath Fitter Franchising, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01048
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bobeck
Defendant:
Bath Fitter Franchising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. P and M Automatic Fire Protection, Inc.
as 8:2026cv02520
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
P and M Automatic Fire Protection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plumbers and Fitters Local Union 101 et al v. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 101 Joint Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust et al
as 3:2026cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Fitters Local Union 101, Daniel McKenna, Matt Biekert and others
Defendant:
Ehret, Inc. and Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 101 Joint Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. RPM Plumbing LLC
as 1:2026cv04213
Plaintiff:
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund, Plumbers & Pipe Fitters Local 23, U.A. Health & Welfare Fund, Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local 23 Fund for Training Journeyman and Apprentices and others
Defendant:
RPM Plumbing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Guardian Fire Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv01391
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Guardian Fire Systems, Inc., Christian Geiger and Rebecca L. V. Geiger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Automatic Sprinkler Local 281, U.A. Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Fire Guard of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv03248
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Automatic Sprinkler Local 281, U.A. Industry Welfare Fund and Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 281
Defendant:
Fire Guard of Illinois, Inc. and Shawn Carroll doing business as Fire Guard of Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. CFP International, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv01119
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
CFP International, LLC, Robert James Faber and Lisa Faber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund et al v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 1:2026cv02705
Plaintiff:
Rockford Pipe Trades Industry Pension Fund, Plumbers & Pipe Fitters Local 23, U.A. Health & Welfare Fund, Plumbers and Pipe Fitters Local 23 Fund for Training Journeyman and Apprentices and others
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Fire Defense Systems, LLC
as 8:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 UA Education Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Fire Defense Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.