Cases 1 - 10 of 724
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America et al v. Joint Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Reynaldo Solano, California State Of and others
Defendant:
Joint Technology Inc doing business as Revert Systems, Jim Patton, Dr. John Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Tennessee, State of et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of, Alabama, State of and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bryson v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Richard Bryson
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deronville, Tyrell v. Warden of Florida State Prison
as 9:2024cv80148
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Deronville
Defendant:
Warden of Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Joel Horta Suarez
as 24-10974
Petitioner:
In re: JOEL ALBERTO HORTA SUAREZ
Respondent:
FLORIDA COURT FOR THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CHIEF JUDGE, BARBARA ARECES, ANTIONIO ARZOLA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
