Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Schrock v. Sanders et al
as 3:2026cv00362
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schrock
Defendant:
FNU Sanders, FNU Baak, FNU Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Anda Villa v. Camacho
as 6:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Raul De Anda Villa
Defendant:
CIT Officer FNU Camacho and CIT Officer FNU Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Jason W Jones
Defendant:
City of Clovis, New Mexico State Police Department, FNU Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Texas Department
as 23-50589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Patrick Bonner
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Department of Public Safety, John West, Chief of Legal Services, Texas Dept.of Public Safety, Robert Hernandez, Jail Administrator, Guadalupe County Jail and others
Ybarra v. Warden et al
as 5:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Ybarra
Defendant:
FNU LNU and FNU Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baca v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Valencia et al
as 1:2021cv00384
Defendant:
Officer Borunda, Captain Garcia, Officer Zamora and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Baca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stuart v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
FNU Parks, FNU Brinkly, FNU Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Hezron Benjamin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-X v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
D Feather, FNU Parks, D Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Antonius El-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davitt v. Castillo et al
as 2:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mike Davitt
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and FNU Castillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Hack et al
as 5:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Officer FNU Kate, Officer FNU Wetherford, Officer FNU Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
