Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00202
Defendant:
FNU Parks, FNU Brinkly, FNU Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Hezron Benjamin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El-X v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
D Feather, FNU Parks, D Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Antonius El-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
FNU Parks, D Dobbs, FNU Saha and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toby Payne v. Scott Appleton, et al
as 19-10601
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT APPLETON, Mental Health Counsler - Robertson Unit, FNU GARCIA, Psychiatrist - Clements Unit, FNU NGUYEN, Psychiatrist - Clements Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY KRISTOPHER PAYNE
Payne v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Defendant:
FNU Almanza, FNU LNU, Kevin D Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Stewart v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv07739
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stewart
Defendant:
FNU Roman, Sheila Mitchell, Los Angeles County Probation Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sutterfield, et al
as 2:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
James Sutterfield, FNU Nguyen and FNU Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sutterfield, et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
James Sutterfield, FNU Nguyen and FNU Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dibrell v. Hermendes et al
as 1:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
Erwin Dibrell
Defendant:
Officer FNU Hermendes and Officer FNU Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
