Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Doiron v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Arthur Doiron
Defendant:
NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, Medical and Forensic Services, Director, Heidi Guinan and others
Not Classified By Court:
NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Inman v. Sharp et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
Scotty Inman
Defendant:
Officer FNU Sharp, Warden Danny Dodd, Warden Hilton Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laidler v. Sharp et al
as 6:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Laidler
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Sharp, Lt. FNU Shoemaker, Sgt. FNU Fugitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hurt et al
as 2:2020cv01120
Defendant:
FNU Sykes, FNU Sharp and FNU Hurt
Plaintiff:
Tristan Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hurt et al
as 1:2020cv01120
Defendant:
FNU Sykes, FNU Sharp and FNU Hurt
Plaintiff:
Tristan Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folsom v. Sharp et al
as 6:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and FNU Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folsom v. Sharp et al
as 5:2019cv01105
Petitioner:
Glen Folsom
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of and FNU Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Folsom v. Sharp et al
as 5:2019cv01068
Defendant:
FNU Sharp and Oklahoma State of
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davila v. Vass et al
as 6:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Lieutenant FNU Vass and FNU Sharp
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buchi v. Utah State et al
as 2:2019cv00325
Defendant:
FNU Sharp, Andrew Mcain, Division of Homeland Security and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Victor P. Buchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
