Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Ray v. Gruber et al
as 6:2025cv00326
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ray
Defendant:
Warden FNU Gruber, Officer FNU Slater and Officer FNU Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vela (ID 107219) v. Stevens et al
as 5:2024cv03201
Defendant:
Aramark and (fnu) Stevens
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Vela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellamy, Jr. v. Aramark Corporation, et al
as 24-3165
Defendant:
T. WILLIAMS, (FNU) ZMUDA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Plaintiff:
RONNIE ALLEN BELLAMY, JR.
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00356
Defendant:
State of Texas, David Eckhart, FNU Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dixon et al
as 5:2024cv00350
Defendant:
FNU Stevens, C. Edelen, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Defendant:
(fnu) Stevens, Aramark Corporation, T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Detention Center Jefferson County, et al
as 22-1452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JOHN MCDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
DETENTION CENTER JEFFERSON COUNTY, MEDICAL WITHIN JEFFCO DETENTION CENTER, ARAMARK and others
Farrell v. Breidenstein et al
as 5:2022cv00978
Plaintiff:
Robert Farrell
Defendant:
FNU Breidenstein, FNU Ferrell, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ingram v. Phyail et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Phyail, F. Perry, J. Idlerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
