Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Walters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Huey Walters
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, FNU Turner, FNU Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Alexander Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Collins
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Eric Dye, Jeffrey Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Evans et al
as 2:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Vinicio Jesus Garcia
Defendant:
FNU Evans, FNU Murphy, FNU Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Elliot et al
as 2:2021cv02036
Plaintiff:
Curtis Banks
Defendant:
Tyrone Elliot, Officer (FNU) Bradfield and Officer (FNU) Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore v. Shults et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
FNU Gilliam, FNU Williams, FNU Mahone and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rials v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv00688
Defendant:
L. Godfrey, Thomas Terry, L. R. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Roneil Rials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Jones et al
as 5:2020cv00262
Defendant:
FNU Smith, L Phillip, B Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Santana Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Westerby v. Attorney General Paton et al
as 1:2020cv00206
Defendant:
FNU Williams, Attorney General Paton, FNU Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Westerby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cane v. Jefferson County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00094
Defendant:
FNU Halkins, FNU Watson, FNU Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Montrel Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
