Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 24-1692
Petitioner:
FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 22-1494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BOYD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv03058
Defendant:
JOHN STEINHART, DR. THOMAS LEHMAN, DR. LITTLES and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 19-2061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCIS BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
In re: Francis Boyd
as 16-4197
Petitioner:
In re: FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Boyd v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2016cv12741
Plaintiff:
Chares Francis Boyd
Defendant:
City of Warren , Warren Police Department , Warren Police Commissioner Jere Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2016cv12734
Plaintiff:
Chares Francis Boyd
Defendant:
City of Warren, Warren Police Department, Police Officer Colin McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. City of Warren et al
as 2:2016cv11640
Plaintiff:
Charles Francis Boyd
Defendant:
City of Warren, Warren Police Department, Officer Colin McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 15-2457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
In re: Francis Boyd
as 13-2774
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: FRANCIS BOYD
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
