Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Chavez-Flamenco v. Garland
as 22-1877
Petitioner:
JOSE FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-FLAMENCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Chavez-Arriaga v. Warden
as 4:2023cv11656
Petitioner:
Francisco Chavez-Arriaga
Respondent:
Warden and Jonathan Hemingway
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Chavez v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 2:2020cv08508
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO CHAVEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Chavez-Gutierrez v. USA
as 4:2021cv00430
Petitioner:
Francisco Arturo Chavez-Gutierrez and Francisco Chavez-Gutierrez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18044
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO CHAVEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francisco Chavez-Rodriguez v. William Barr
as 19-72463
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CHAVEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
