Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Michael Cota v. John Malone, et al
as 22-15151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COTA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN MALONE, THOMAS M. GREGORY, DOUGLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 22-70003
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, JOHN MALONE, THOMAS M. GREGORY and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
USA v. Paul Torres, III
as 21-50285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL FRANCISCO TORRES III
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 21-71278
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, RYAN YOUNG, NADINE CHRZANOWSKI and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Cota v. Malone et al
as 3:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
Michael Cota
Defendant:
John Malone, Thomas M. Gregory, Douglas County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Torres v. Composites One LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01270
Defendant:
Composites One LLC, Shawn Angel and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Paul Torres, III
as 21-50006
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL FRANCISCO TORRES III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Francisco Torres v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 5:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Regal Beloit America, Inc., Regal Beloit Corporation, Emerson Power Transmission Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Torres v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08227
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Francisco Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02139
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
