Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Jackson v. Lara
as 23-40210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John E. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Lara, Christopher Matt, Michelle Kelly and others
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
S Penry, FNU Van Ness, FNU Tenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farooque Ahmed v. BOP, et al
as 21-5134
Defendant / Appellee:
Ian Connors, Administrator, Nat'l Inmate Affairs, Federal Bureau of Prisons, BOP, Sara M. Revell, Res. Dir., N. Cent. Regional Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Farooque Ahmed
James Dinkins v. Frank Lara, et al
as 19-40809
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA MALLET, JOHN DOE, Chief of Psychology Department, SHARA JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DINKINS
Dinkins v. Lara et al
as 1:2019cv00424
Defendant:
Shara Johnson, Frank Lara, Stephen Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
James Dinkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2019cv00392
Defendant:
FNU Halzapfel, Frank Lara, FNU Tenner and others
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jason Dent v. William Barr, et al
as 19-5234
Defendant / Appellee:
Berry, Officer, United States Penitentiary Beaumont, Sued in Official & Individual Capacity, T.J. Watson, Complex Warden, United States Penitentiary Beaumont, Sued in Official & Individual Capacity, William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, Sued in Official & Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Dent
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dent v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv01082
Defendant:
Frank Lara and William Barr
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
