Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Raul Labrador, et al
as 23-35518
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, On Behalf of Itself, It's Staff, Physicians and Patients, CAITLIN GUSTAFSON, On Behalf of Herself and Her Patients and DARIN WEYHRICH, On Behalf of Himself and His Patients
Defendant / Appellant: RAUL R. LABRADOR, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Defendant: MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF NURSING, In Their Official Capacities, COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, In Their Official Capacities and others
Craig v. Franklin County Prosecutors Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03789
Defendant: Columbus Police Department, Sheriff Dallas Baldwin, Andrew Ginther and others
Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Craig, St. and Jimmie L. Craig, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region et al v. Ohio Department of Health et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00189
Defendant: Ross Cirincione, Bedford Heights Director of Law, Janet Ciotola, Cuyahoga Falls Director of Law, Andrew Garth, Cincinnati City Solicitor and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, M.D. Sharon Liner, Women's Med Group Professional Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Preterm-Cleveland, et al v. Attorney General of Ohio, et al
as 20-3365
Defendant: HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR, MAHONING COUNTY PROSECUTOR, FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR and others
Defendant / Appellant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO, SECRETARY STATE MEDICAL BOARD OF OHIO and DIRECTOR OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO, CAPITAL CARE NETWORK OF TOLEDO, DOCTOR SHARON LINER and others
Amicus Curiae: CITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY VALUES, on behalf of 125 Individual Doctors, Nurses and Health Professionals to be named; Professional Medical Associations to be named., COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, and States Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia and AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
Lam v. Finn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant: Ofc. Greg Palovick, Ofc. Unknown Allen, Stephan Lawhorn and others
Plaintiff: James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lam v. Becker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00139
Defendant: Matthew Becker, County of Franklin (Franklin County Public Defender's Office), Stephan M. Lawhorn and others
Plaintiff: James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preterm-Cleveland et al v. Ohio Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00360
Defendant: Hamilton County Prosecutor, Mahoning County Prosecutor, Franklin County Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio, M.D. Sharon Liner, Capital Care Network of Toledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas of the City of Columbus et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00362
Plaintiff: Rico Isaih Hairston
Defendant: Franklin County Court of Common Pleas of the City of Columbus, Franklin County Public Defender's Office and Franklin County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Belfield v. State of Missouri, et al
as 16-4566
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael G. Belfield
Defendant - Appellee: State of Missouri, Franklin County, Washington County and others
Hamilton v. Franklin County Prosecutor's Office et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01173
Plaintiff: Pierre Hamilton
Defendant: Franklin County Prosecutor's Office, City of Columbus Police Dept. and State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?