Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Davis v. Silva et al
as 1:2026cv04811
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Davis
Defendant:
Edward Silva, State of California and Chika Mbadugha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04797
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Guerrero
as 25-70020
Petitioner:
Franklin Davis
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Huhn et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01045
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Huhn, Janice Abrams-Young, Emma Adames and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HUHN et al v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2025cv00799
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HUHN, JANICE ABRAMS-YOUNG, EMMA ADAMES and others
Defendant:
AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC, AMEREX CORP, ARCHROMA U.S. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
HUHN et al v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as NJ/2:25-cv-00799
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HUHN, JANICE ABRAMS-YOUNG, EMMA ADAMES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
