Cases
Salvatore ChimentiIn re: Salvatore Chimenti
as 22-1693
Petitioner: In re: SALVATORE CHIMENTI
Respondent: FREDERICK FRANK and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GEC US 1 LLC et al v. Frontier Renewables LLC
as 4:2016cv01276
Defendant: Frontier Renewables LLC, Balduin Hesse, Reinhard Hesse and others
Plaintiff: GEC US 1 LLC, AS (WRIGHT) LLC and ACTIV SOLAR HOLDINGS (US) INC.
3Rd Party Defendant: Activ Solar GmbH, ACTIV SOLAR (UK) LTD, COLIN BENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
In re: Randall Chumley v. Frederick Frank, et al
as 12-2245
Petitioner: In re: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent: FREDERICK FRANK, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LAWRENCE COUNTY
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00228
Defendant: Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff: Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hendriks v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00176
Defendant: Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. , Fredric Eshelman , Raymond Hill and others
Plaintiff: Mark Hendriks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Marshall Hale, et al
as 11-2295
Petitioner: In re: MARSHALL HALE
Respondent: DA PHILADELPHIA and FREDERICK FRANK, SUPERINTENDENT
In re: Mark Young, et al
as 09-1467
Petitioner: In re: MARK YOUNG
Respondent: FREDERICK FRANK, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI HUNTINGDON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
CHUMLEY v. FRANK, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1999cv01966
Petitioner: RANDALL HOYT CHUMLEY
Respondent: FREDERICK FRANK , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?