Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10539
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03446
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FREDRICK JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kikongo Hakim-Akbar Jones v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 4:2020cv01422
Petitioner:
Kikongo Hakim-Akbar Jones, F. Jones and Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
Mayor Gavin Newsom and Secretary of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jasma McCullough v. Dept of Fam and Protc Services, et al
as 20-20058
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK JONES, SHAYLONDA HERRON, DEIDRA FORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMA MCCULLOUGH
Jones v. Sheahan et al
as 3:2019cv50108
Defendant:
Richard A Divine, Micheal Sheahan and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jasma McCullough v. Dept of Fam and Protc Services, et al
as 19-20309
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDRICK JONES and SONDRA WHITE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMA MCCULLOUGH
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 1:2018cv00473
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Jones
Defendant:
John Gorman, Jack O'Malley, Rita A. Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 4:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jasma McCullough
Defendant:
Department of Family and Protective Services, Shaylonda Herron , Sonya White and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
McCullouch v. DFPS et al
as 4:2017mc00047
Plaintiff:
Jasma McCullouch
Defendant:
DFPS, Sonya White, Deidra Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
