Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Frost v. KCP Advisory Group, LLC
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUE T. FROST
Defendant / Appellant:
KCP ADVISORY GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
BI 40 LLC, EF LLC, ROBERT EISENSTEIN and others
FROST v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN B. FROST
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and BROCK & SCOTT PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Frost Solutions, LLC v. Baglien et al
as 1:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Frost Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Baglien, Christopher Lareau and Vue Robotics, LLC
Frost v. BI 40 LLC et al
as 1:2022cv11005
Plaintiff:
Sue T Frost
Defendant:
BI 40 LLC, KCP Advisory Group, LLC, EF LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Patrick F. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Patrick Frost
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FROST v. CASTLE POINT MORTGAGE INC et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, CASTLE POINT MORTGAGE INC, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN B. FROST
Interested Party:
MIDLAND FUNDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost et al v. NH, State of
as 1:2018cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Frost and Douglas E. Frost
Defendant:
NH, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost et al v. Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11578
Plaintiff:
Eric Frost and Dawn Frost
Defendant:
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. and Suffolk Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frost v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv30077
Plaintiff:
Allison M. Frost
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
