Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Visual Comfort LLC v. Designer Lighting & Fans, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08825
Plaintiff:
Visual Comfort LLC
Defendant:
Designer Lighting & Fans, Inc. and DecorPrice Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Slavick v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2026cv00361
Plaintiff:
Chris Slavick
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Han et al v. Point Ruston LLC et al
as 3:2026cv05697
Plaintiff:
Bingru Han, Bo Liu, Changjun Gu and others
Defendant:
Point Ruston LLC, Point Ruston Phase II LLC, Loren M Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01563
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fans First Entertainment, LLC v. King
as 3:2026cv00288
Plaintiff:
Fans First Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Dana E King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moen v. Kokkalis, et al.
as 26-3802
Plaintiff:
HARRO MOEN
Defendant:
NICOLAS KOKKALIS, DOES 1-50, CHENGDIAO FAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
