Cases 41 - 50 of 160
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017fp00256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv11049
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rounds, Jr. v. Enviromental Protection Agency et al
as 4:2017cv40072
Plaintiff:
Irving F. Rounds, Jr.
Defendant:
Enviromental Protection Agency , Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ) and U.S. Department of of Labor -OSHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Berry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Mark Hastbacka
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Banks v. Werner, et al
as 17-1322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WERNER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHAEL POMPEO, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10412
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Cessar, et al
as 17-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT CESSAR, DAVID HICKTON, DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Banks v. FBI, et al
as 17-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, ROBERT WERNER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
