Cases 1 - 10 of 20
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1237
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1236
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 24-1235
Appellant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Appellee:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Dimitar Petlechkov v. FEDEX Corporation, et al
as 23-12259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC and others
Petlechkov v. Fedex Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04555
Plaintiff:
Dimitar Petlechkov
Defendant:
Fedex Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.In re: FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
as 22-156
Petitioner:
In re: FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Respondent:
R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
Sunbutter, LLC v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sunbutter, LLC
Defendant:
Fedex Corporate Servics, Inc., FedEx Corporate Services, Inc. and FedEx Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Yvonne Craddock v. FedEx Corporate Services, Inc., et al
as 20-5655
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. and LEEANNE SCALLION, in her official position as supervisor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YVONNE CRADDOCK
Saric v. Synter Resource Group, LLC et al
as 0:2020cv60770
Defendant:
Synter Resource Group, LLC and Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Serge Saric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pepicelli et al v. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
as 8:2018cv03653
Defendant:
Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amberlyn Johnston and Anthony Pepicelli
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
