Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03092
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10078
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04147
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02652
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States of America v. Zambrano-Pacheco (Bravo-Castro)
as 26-3070
Defendant:
ANDREINA DEL CARMEN HERNANDEZ, JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ PEREZ, KELLEN ALEJANDRO JASPE BUSTAMANTE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ferrer-Sosa v. USA
as 3:2026cv01680
Petitioner:
Jose Ferrer-Sosa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06806
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00548
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sandra Rodriguez Ferrer, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 26-13687
Petitioner:
SANDRA ISABEL RODRIGUEZ FERRER, ROXIE ALEXANDRA REDONDO RODRIGUEZ and HAROLD DAVID ZUNIGA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
