Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Keeper v. Ferrer & Poirot, G.P.
as 1:2012cv03110
Plaintiff:
Kristy Keeper
Defendant:
Ferrer & Poirot, G.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samuel Jefferson v. Mary O'Toole, et al
as 12-6098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY O'TOOLE, CORIZON CORP., F/N/U "BARLESS" and others
Jefferson v. O'Toole et al
as 3:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Molly O'Toole, Corizon Corp., f/n/u Barless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Barless et al
as 3:2012cv00485
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Charles Barless, Corizon Mental Health, F,P,W, Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, et al
as 11-6366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FERRER, POIROT & WANSBROUGH, ELI LILLY CORPORATION, GARRETSON LAW FIRM, LLC and others
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough et al
as 3:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough, Eli Lilly Corporation and Garretson Law Firm, LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
Mat Daniel, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough Law Firm et al
as 3:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough Law Firm, Eli Lilly & Company and Garretson Law Firm L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough Law Firm et al
as 3:2009mc00148
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough Law Firm, Eli Lilly & Company and Garretson Law Firm L.L.C.
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough et al
as 2:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Co and Garretson Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
