Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rhonda Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton II, and in her own right
Defendant / Appellee:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, TA East Penn Refractories, AO SMITH CORP and others
Defendant:
FOSECO INC, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO and others
Barrett et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03911
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Lofton Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc, and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Barrett, Jr., Estate of Tracie Ward, Laura Rollins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Janis Flowers , James Flowers and Gerald Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Aurora Pump Company , Honeywell International, Inc. , Dap Products Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Aurora Pump Company , 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KNIBBS et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 5:2017cv00092
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., PFIZER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KNIBBS, ROBERT C. KNIBBS, SR. and TERRY KNIBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lenk et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2016cv10000
Plaintiff:
Lenk, Larry L. Lenk and Sandra J. Lenk
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation, Ferro Engineering Division of ON Marine Services Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
French et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2016cv01777
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Riley Power, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
French, Donald R French and Charlene French
Cross Defendant:
Allied Glove Corporation, Atlas Industries, Inc., Beazer East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Janya Sawyer v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 16-1530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANYA SAWYER, Representative of the Estate of Joseph W. Morris, GARNETTE MORRIS, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Joseph W. Morris, NANCY PIKE, Surviving Child of Joseph W. Morris and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Crane Packing Company, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, f/k/a Owens-Illinois, Incorporated and others
Third Party Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, MANVILLE TRUST PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST and others
Sawyer et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Janya Sawyer , Garnette Morris , Nancy Pike and others
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation , John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co., and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Phelps Packing & Rubber Co. , J.H. France Refractories Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , CBS Corporation , Cooper Industries, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
General Refractories Co., Hopeman Brothers, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
MCIC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Smith et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03742
Plaintiff:
Tynan Smith and Mary Ellen Smith
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STELLAR et al v. ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv05083
Defendant:
FAIRMOUNT SUPPLY COMPANY, LINDE, LLC, MORGAN ENGINEERING and others
Plaintiff:
RITA G. STELLAR and MARY SCHAFFER
Cross Defendant:
GOULD PUMPS, INC., HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY, J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
