Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ellis v. Faherty, et al.
as 26-2933
Plaintiff:
KEILYN-LORENZ ELLIS, Beneficial Title Holder for the Estate of Keilyn Lorenz-Ellis
Defendant:
SHANNON FAHERTY, individual and official capacity, CHRISTOPHER PALLONE, individual and official capacity, DANIEL FESTER and others
Wilfred K. Lucas v. San Bernardino County et al
as 5:2026cv01959
Plaintiff:
Wilfred K. Lucas
Defendant:
San Bernardino County and Daniel J. Fester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sayonkon v. Lammer
as 3:2025cv50447
Petitioner:
Fester Sayonkon
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer, Daniel Stickles and Christopher Hanson
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Supastar Ware v. Trevor Foley, et al
as 25-2888
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware, formerly known as Lamont D. Ware
Defendant:
Trevor Foley, Anne L. Precythe, Darren Snullen and others
Keilyn-Lorenz Ellis v. Shannon Faherty et al
as 5:2025cv01245
Plaintiff:
Keilyn-Lorenz Ellis
Defendant:
Shannon Faherty, Christopher Pallone, Daniel Fester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ware v. Foley et al
as 4:2025cv00383
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
Trevor Foley, Ann Precythe, Darren Snullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fester Sayonkon v. United States
as 24-2499
Petitioner:
Fester Sayonkon, also known as Festus
Respondent:
United States of America
Mund & Fester GmbH v. CMA-CGM S.A.
as 1:2024cv05386
Plaintiff:
Mund & Fester GmbH
Defendant:
CMA-CGM S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Mund & Fester GmbH v. MAERSK A/S
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Mund & Fester GmbH
Defendant:
MAERSK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc Marine Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
