Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Fiegel v. GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18676
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Fiegel
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FIEGEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19166
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEK FIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruce Fiegel v. Phillips S. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv01455
Defendant:
Terry V. Rogers, George R. Johnson, Lindsay A. Hall and others
Nominal Defendant:
Hecla Mining Company
Plaintiff:
Bruce Fiegel
Boydstun v. Hauge et al
as 5:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Robert Hauge and Adam Fiegel
Plaintiff:
William Jeffrey Boydstun
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FIEGEL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv02081
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
MARY JEAN FIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fiegel et al v. Wooten et al
as 6:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Donald Fiegel and Nancy Fiegel
Defendant:
Eric Wooten and Colenna Konkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fitzgerald v. Attorney General, United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv00019
Petitioner:
Shirland Fitzgerald
Respondent:
Attorney General, United States of America, Jennifer Saad, Fiegel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Crowell v. Christopher Fiegel, et al
as 16-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER FIEGEL, Corrections Officer and MARY YOUNG, Corrections Officer
Mavrix Photographs LLC v. Fan Droppings LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00318
Defendant:
Does, Fan Droppings LLC, Bradley Fiegel and others
Plaintiff:
Mavrix Photographs LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
