Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Andres Cristobal v. Nathalie Asher, et al
as 21-35169
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant: ANDRES CRISTOBAL
Elsa Diaz Reyes v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-35142
Respondent / Appellee: ELIZABETH GODFREY, Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Seattle District Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: ELSA DIAZ REYES
Ruachkuoth Thok v. Marcos Charles, et al
as 21-1389
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General, United States and others
Petitioner: Ruachkuoth Wiyual Thok
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv24382
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fawzi Zaya v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-1667
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, REBECCA ADDUCCI, in her official capacity as Detroit Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner: FAWZI ZAYA and FAWZI SAMI ZAYA
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner: GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee: ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant: JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Jose Obando-Segura v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-7736
Respondent / Appellee: THOMAS HOMAN, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHARLES LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSE ANDRES OBANDO-SEGURA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv21682
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vaillant v. Assistant Field Office Director for Krome SPC
as 1:2018cv25139
Plaintiff: Yackson Vaillant
Defendant: Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, Assistant Field Office Director for Krome SPC, Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?