Cases 41 - 50 of 318
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11624
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ryan v. DeMaria, et al
as 22-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES P. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLO DEMARIA, JR., Mayor, City of Everett, JAMIE RUSSO, then-Director of Constituent Services, DEBRA J. BRETON, Past Attorney/Mortgage Broker and others
Defendant:
ROBERT GREENE, Suffolk County Assistant District Attorney
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Gadson
as 22-1444
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BERNARD GADSON
Interested Party:
UMASS FIVE COLLEGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, EVERGREEN CREDIT UNION, FREEDOM CREDIT UNION and others
US v. Gadson
as 22-1449
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BERNARD GADSON
Interested Party:
UMASS FIVE COLLEGE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, FREEDOM CREDIT UNION, EVERGREEN CREDIT UNION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rodriguez v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Alma Rodriguez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
