Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01323
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. and LPL Licensing, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc. and Fingerhut
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Oberalis LLC v. Bluestem Brands, Inc. (d/b/a Fingerhut)
as 2:2015cv00955
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc. (d/b/a Fingerhut)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Roads, LLC v. Fingerhut
as 1:2013cv05336
Plaintiff:
Roads, LLC
Defendant:
David Fingerhut
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. Fingerhut
as 1:2013cv22462
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
Fingerhut
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Walker v. Health International Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv03256
Plaintiff:
Andre Walker
Defendant:
Fitness Quest, Health International Corporation, HSN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101 (35:101 Patent Infringement)
MSA PRODUCTS, INC. v. NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05261
Plaintiff:
MSA PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
NIFTY HOME PRODUCTS, INC. , FRANK TIEMANN , FINGERHUT and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv01091
Plaintiff:
Aviva Sports, Inc., Aviva Sports, Inc. and Aviva Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc., Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc., Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Lemelson Medical Ed v. Comp USA Inc, et al
as 2:2000cv00663
Defendant:
Spiegel Catalog Incorporated, Ingram Micro Incorporated, Kmart Corporation and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Tech Data Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation LP
3Rd Party Defendant:
Curlin Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
